On May 5, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Dan,
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
I'm finding that the font-lock in the indirect buffer spawned by C-
c '
on a source code block is not correct when there is a preceding (odd
number of) apostroph
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
>
>> I'm finding that the font-lock in the indirect buffer spawned by C-c '
>> on a source code block is not correct when there is a preceding (odd
>> number of) apostrophes / backticks etc (depending on the
>>
Hi Dan,
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
I'm finding that the font-lock in the indirect buffer spawned by C-c '
on a source code block is not correct when there is a preceding (odd
number of) apostrophes / backticks etc (depending on the language).
E.g.
* this works fine as t
I'm finding that the font-lock in the indirect buffer spawned by C-c '
on a source code block is not correct when there is a preceding (odd
number of) apostrophes / backticks etc (depending on the language). E.g.
* this works fine as there is no apostrophe
#+begin_src sh
for i in $(seq -w 1 22)
