On May 22, 2007, at 10:07, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
On 5/21/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. When the state of an item changes from nothing to the first in
the
> TODO sequence, no note is taken and the state change is not logged.
Is
> this by design?
Yes.
I should have upg
On 5/21/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. When the state of an item changes from nothing to the first in the
> TODO sequence, no note is taken and the state change is not logged. Is
> this by design?
Yes.
I should have upgraded more often :). In 4.60, which I used prior to
t
Actually, lets just take your patch, it is useful.
One change: The in-buffer setting will be
#+PRIORITIES: highest lowest default
for example
#+PRIORITIES: A C B
or
#+PRIORITIES: 1 9 9
Thanks!
- Carsten
On May 21, 2007, at 15:11, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
copying to the list:
Than
On May 21, 2007, at 15:11, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
copying to the list:
Thank you. I thought about using sorting strategy to sort by tags, but
the requirement that the score must be the last tag has stopped me. I
like the approach you describe, but it still has some deficiencies.
First, any tag n
copying to the list:
Thank you. I thought about using sorting strategy to sort by tags, but
the requirement that the score must be the last tag has stopped me. I
like the approach you describe, but it still has some deficiencies.
First, any tag not included in the set of the pre-defined tags brea
Hi Dmitri,
before I look deeper into your patch, please try the
following and tell us if this does the trick:
On May 16, 2007, at 11:43, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know the opinion of the community (and Carsten's in
particular, of course) on the following idea -- do you think it
Hello,
I'd like to know the opinion of the community (and Carsten's in
particular, of course) on the following idea -- do you think it would
be useful to have in-buffer settings to customize priorities?
The background story (sorry if it's verbose) is like this. I keep my
reading list in org-mode
