Carsten Dominik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 14:52, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >On a related topic, if I have S-{left,right} on my org-disputed-keys
> >list, this breaks using them for changing a timestamp by one-day
> >increments, even though I don't consider that a clashing binding.
On Jul 28, 2007, at 14:52, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:17:06PM +0100, Leo wrote:
(info "(org)Multiple sets in one file")
| `C-S-'
| `C-S-'
| These keys jump from one TODO subset to the next. In the above
| example, `C-S-' would jump from `TODO' or `DONE' to
|
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:17:06PM +0100, Leo wrote:
> (info "(org)Multiple sets in one file")
> | `C-S-'
> | `C-S-'
> | These keys jump from one TODO subset to the next. In the above
> | example, `C-S-' would jump from `TODO' or `DONE' to
> | `REPORT', and any of the words in the s
Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These key bindings are to move from one set of the TODO items to
> another, which intuitively are a vertical motion.
Well, I don't share this intuition.
Since S- cycles through TODO states, it's consistent to use
C-S- to cycle through TODO-states sets.
And si
(info "(org)Multiple sets in one file")
| `C-S-'
| `C-S-'
| These keys jump from one TODO subset to the next. In the above
| example, `C-S-' would jump from `TODO' or `DONE' to
| `REPORT', and any of the words in the second row to `CANCELED'.
These key bindings are to move from o
