Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread David Maus
Carsten Dominik wrote: >On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: >> >>> Please that we no longer use ChangeLog, but that we place entries >>> with similar syntax into the commit message and then later >>> build ChangeLog from that. >>> >>> If you look at the final commit, you'll see what

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Karsten Heymann
Am 01.07.2010 11:07, schrieb Carsten Dominik: > > On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Stephen Eglen wrote: >> - how do I query git to find out where this file has gone? > > This one was removed because its functionality is included in Org babel. > Files added and removed are usually listed in the list

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Karsten Heymann
Am 01.07.2010 11:07, schrieb Carsten Dominik: > > On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Stephen Eglen wrote: >> - how do I query git to find out where this file has gone? > > This one was removed because its functionality is included in Org babel. > Files added and removed are usually listed in the list

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: Please that we no longer use ChangeLog, but that we place entries with similar syntax into the commit message and then later build ChangeLog from that. If you look at the final commit, you'

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: Please that we no longer use ChangeLog, but that we place entries with similar syntax into the commit message and then later build ChangeLog from that. If you look at the final commit, you'll see what I mean. I see - neat idea about the Chan

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Stephen Eglen
> Please that we no longer use ChangeLog, but that we place entries > with similar syntax into the commit message and then later > build ChangeLog from that. > > If you look at the final commit, you'll see what I mean. I see - neat idea about the ChangeLog. Can you still use 'C-x 4 a' from a bu

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Stephen Eglen wrote: Here is a patch for contrib/README. I've not included though any mention of the new babel folder in contrib. Stephen Applied, thanks. Please that we no longer use ChangeLog, but that we place entries with similar syntax into the commit mes

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Stephen Eglen
Here is a patch for contrib/README. I've not included though any mention of the new babel folder in contrib. Stephen diff --git a/contrib/ChangeLog b/contrib/ChangeLog index 44db137..af18a84 100644 --- a/contrib/ChangeLog +++ b/contrib/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2010-07-01 Stephen Eglen + + *

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Stephen Eglen
Thanks Carsten; Carsten Dominik wrote: > This one was removed because its functionality is included in Org babel. > Files added and removed are usually listed in the list of user visible > changes. > I am not sure how to find it in git. I think I just found at least somethign (sorry, I'm new at

Re: [Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Stephen Eglen wrote: contrib/README seems out of date; in particular this file I was interested in seeing has gone: org-R.el --- Computation using the R language Questions: - how do I query git to find out where this file has gone? This one was

[Orgmode] contrib/README

2010-07-01 Thread Stephen Eglen
contrib/README seems out of date; in particular this file I was interested in seeing has gone: org-R.el --- Computation using the R language Questions: - how do I query git to find out where this file has gone? - who maintains README? Or should I check them all and send a patch