I am glad to find that Worg will be reorganized. Great content there.
A strong recommendation for accessibility: if you try a sidebar,
please test it with the maximum value for minimum font size in
Firefox. Check for hidden text, overlapping text, and annoying
scrollbars. This is true for any w
Hi all,
Dan Davison writes:
> Worg could do with some reorganization. It is not at all easy to find
> stuff in there (at least, using a web browser).
Shaking up this great thread.
A small idea: maybe we can use more tags/properties/categories in Worg
and define some agenda views that everyone
Yeah, this sounds neat. I'd like something for my own web. I use
wiki-style linking for site navigation so far (like worg), but if we
could use tags to organize posts and then have a sidebar or top
tab-style navigation auto-inserted into the element, that would
be ueber-cool.
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 14
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> John Hendy writes:
>
> > Great topic. I agree. This will be quite the overhaul! Perhaps we should
> > propose some type of organizing scheme? By level of usage (beg,
> > intermediate, adv?), by functional use (notes, todos, exporting, math,
>
John Hendy writes:
> Great topic. I agree. This will be quite the overhaul! Perhaps we should
> propose some type of organizing scheme? By level of usage (beg,
> intermediate, adv?), by functional use (notes, todos, exporting, math,
> babel?), etc.? Just some ideas. If one's going to reorganize,
On 13/10/10 16:41, Eric Schulte wrote:
Dan Davison writes:
Worg could do with some reorganization. It is not at all easy to find
stuff in there (at least, using a web browser).
I agree there is certainly room for improvement here. Maybe this sort
of re-organization should be considered alon
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
> Worg could do with some reorganization. It is not at all easy to find
> stuff in there (at least, using a web browser). I don't currently use
> Org to publish a website so I may be missing lots of tricks here, but I
> see two problems at least
Dan Davison writes:
> Worg could do with some reorganization. It is not at all easy to find
> stuff in there (at least, using a web browser).
I agree there is certainly room for improvement here. Maybe this sort
of re-organization should be considered along with the new CSS changes.
[...]
> T
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Ian Barton wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> There is a file in worg called org-color-themes.org, which contains
>> your colour theme (railscast). However, it's not referenced by any
>> of the other worg pages, so you couldn't find it if you did
