Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Sep 5, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi Carsten,
I'll give Bernt's suggestion a try, and hopefully this will happen a
lot less. I am quite fond of the sequence shifting keys though, so
we'll see how I get on.
Rather than re-defining undo, which I can
On Sep 5, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi Carsten,
I'll give Bernt's suggestion a try, and hopefully this will happen a
lot less. I am quite fond of the sequence shifting keys though, so
we'll see how I get on.
Rather than re-defining undo, which I can see might cause problem
Hi Carsten,
I'll give Bernt's suggestion a try, and hopefully this will happen a lot
less. I am quite fond of the sequence shifting keys though, so we'll
see how I get on.
Rather than re-defining undo, which I can see might cause problems.
Would it be possible to add an extra command into t
Hi Rick,
since you are normally going to edit the note, certainly with the
ability
to undo, I don't think it makes sense to redefine undo for this. I
can see how what you
ask for would be useful, but I see no good logic to implement it.
Maybe the easiest is to define yourself a separate ke
Apologies for the noise, but I haven't seen a response to this feature
request / query, and org-mode continues to bug me because of this :-)
Any responses, suggestions (and especially implemenations ;-) ) welcome.
Thanks again,
R.
Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi all,
I make quite extensive use of o
Hi all,
I make quite extensive use of org's sequences, and make use of the
org-log-done features to prompt for a note when a task is closed.
My problem is that when reorganising I often push a sequence on to a
done state instead of switching sequences, i.e. I press S-
instead of C-S-. When
