Nick,
thank you for figuring this out.
Will upgrade as suggested.
Again thank you both for the great application.
Andrew
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Fix, thanks, in particular to Nick for sorting this out.
>
> Andrew, I strongly suggest you upgrade to Emacs 22.
>
>
Fix, thanks, in particular to Nick for sorting this out.
Andrew, I strongly suggest you upgrade to Emacs 22.
- Carsten
On Mar 10, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
[I mangled the previous response, so let me try again.]
andrew dasys wrote:
Nick,
thank you for looking at this.
I am runn
[I mangled the previous response, so let me try again.]
andrew dasys wrote:
> Nick,
> thank you for looking at this.
>
> I am running Emacs 21.4.1 Nothing bleeding edge here.
>
> The help for split-string looks reasonable (compiled Lisp comes from "subr"
> ) (complete output attached)
>
andrew dasys wrote:
> Blank at start of file does not do it for me.
>
Yes, this is just a workaround for the funny ordering: it does not resolve
the error you get (but I hope that the patch that I just posted will).
Nick
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing l
andrew dasys wrote:
> Nick,
> thank you for looking at this.
>
> I am running Emacs 21.4.1 Nothing bleeding edge here.
>
> The help for split-string looks reasonable (compiled Lisp comes from "subr"
> ) (complete output attached)
>
...
> split-string is a compiled Lisp function in `sub
Blank at start of file does not do it for me.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> [replying to my own mail]
>
> Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> >
> > I said above that the export succeeds and it does, in the sense that I
> > get no errors. However, the exported latex looks strange - the
Nick,
thank you for looking at this.
I am running Emacs 21.4.1 Nothing bleeding edge here.
The help for split-string looks reasonable (compiled Lisp comes from "subr"
) (complete output attached)
A bit of debugging gets me to the point where split-string works fine if you
only include the t
[replying to my own mail]
Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> I said above that the export succeeds and it does, in the sense that I
> get no errors. However, the exported latex looks strange - the table
> comes *before* the "MASH" section. Is this a bug or is it a peculiarity
> of my configuration? Can som
andrew dasys wrote:
>
> * MASH
> | id | Actor | Character |
> |+---+---|
> | 1 | Allan Alda| "Hawkeye" Benjamin Pierce |
> | 2 | Gary Burghoff | "Radar" Walter O'Reilly |
> | 3 | Loretta Switt | "Hotlips" Margaret Hoolihan
Carsten,
Attached text file with original table.org and associated backtrace. This
was run on 6.24a fresh from git.
Slight delay in that I could not get back to my Linux machine for a few
days. Also the org-reload does not work as it seems neither my windows or
ubuntu machine recognize find-libra
Please make a backtrace with uncompiled code:
Reload Org with
C-u C-c C-x r
and hit the error again.
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:48 PM, andrew dasys wrote:
Trying to org-export-latex-... any table in 6.23trans and 6.23b
results both on WinXP and Ubuntu results in an error. S
Trying to org-export-latex-... any table in 6.23trans and 6.23b results both
on WinXP and Ubuntu results in an error. Sending to html works great. Any
guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Table is as simple As I could think of:
* MASH
| id | Actor | Character |
|+---
12 matches
Mail list logo
