On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:19:06 -0500, Russell Adams wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 12:46:28PM -0400, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>> I have an idea. We can leave the original table intact,
>> while making a new dynamically generated table derived from
>> the original one.
> The org-babel idea was the do
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 12:46:28PM -0400, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> I have an idea. We can leave the original table intact,
> while making a new dynamically generated table derived from
> the original one.
The org-babel idea was the do similar, but again you will not have the
ability to edit the dat
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:01:30 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:49:46AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>>
Would it be feasible to "narrow" a table by criteria on a specific
field in between separators? Ie: only
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:49:46AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Would it be feasible to "narrow" a table by criteria on a specific
field in between separators? Ie: only display those cells in field A
if they are > 2, or if field B matches "P
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:55:16AM -0500, Russell Adams wrote:
> > As you can see I got rid of a few horizontal separator lines, and we
> > don't currently have totals. I'll suggest fixes for that below, but my
> > main point is that although it may make sense to extend org-mode, it's
> > already e
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:44:23AM -0400, Dan Davison wrote:
> How about keeping a master table containing all the information, and
> then generating narrowed views as separate tables? The babel way to do
> this would be to have a block function "filter-table" (provided below)
> and then call it wh
Hi Russell,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
>
>> Fellow Org'ers,
>>
>> I adore the text spreadsheet, however there's one feature Excel
>> provides which I don't have in org.
>>
>> I often use Excel for "lists", where I can sort or narrow the data by
>>
How can you expand/narrow the disabled lines if you want to show/hide them?
This will probably interfere with normal TAB use inside a table.
I think that the ability to "disable" some lines based on data in a column,
such as in your example, can be very useful. But maybe we don't need to
really c
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:49:46AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> Would it be feasible to "narrow" a table by criteria on a specific
>> field in between separators? Ie: only display those cells in field A
>> if they are > 2, or if field B matches "Pick Me!".
>
> This one might be possible - but
On Apr 1, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
Fellow Org'ers,
I adore the text spreadsheet, however there's one feature Excel
provides which I don't have in org.
I often use Excel for "lists", where I can sort or narrow the data by
specific criteria from a larger list.
Would it be feasib
Fellow Org'ers,
I adore the text spreadsheet, however there's one feature Excel
provides which I don't have in org.
I often use Excel for "lists", where I can sort or narrow the data by
specific criteria from a larger list.
Would it be feasible to "narrow" a table by criteria on a specific
field
11 matches
Mail list logo
