On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Aaron Hammitt wrote:
I like the fact that I don't have to clutter org-export-latex-
classes with so many options. I also like org-export-latex-packages-
alist better than what I was doing previously with org-export-latex-
append-header.
The downside is that I had
I like the fact that I don't have to clutter org-export-latex-classes with
so many options. I also like org-export-latex-packages-alist better than
what I was doing previously with org-export-latex-append-header.
The downside is that I had some conflicts between the org default packages
(with eith
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi, Carsten,
>
> Here is new new section from the list of changes, about the LaTeX
> setup. I would like to hear honest answers if I have gone completely
> crazy, of if this actually makes any sense.
[...]
I only skimmed the discussion in the list. Your release notes app
Carsten,
I, for one, like this writeup. It is very clear concerning the
ins and outs of the new setup. Of course, I paid attention to all
the other discussion on this topic so I may be somewhat biased.
It only *sounds* complicated when you see it all laid out like you
have it below. It breaks
Dear all,
I need some feedback.
Here is new new section from the list of changes, about the LaTeX
setup. I would like to hear honest answers if I have gone completely
crazy, of if this actually makes any sense.
Thanks.
- Carsten
---
