Carsten Dominik writes:
> I have not added you patch as it is, because in some ways the syntax
> it adds is questionable, and, as others have pointed out, sorting can
> be done in different ways, too.
>
> However, instead, I have introduced a variable that can be set to a
> user-defined function
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I would like to have a show of hands who is interested in this
> treatment of finer priorities. Should we add this patch (I don't vote
> because I do not use priorities)
-1
Org-mode power users in need of finer-grained priority control already
have the option of widen
