Re: [Orgmode] Re: latex export and beamer columns

2009-11-26 Thread Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
Maybe a simpler notation could be used instead direct latex since we are talking about official support for beamer in org-mode. For instance , | * Teste beamer: This is a Section | *** Teste beamer: This is a Subsection | * This is the frame title | Frame content | | * This is

Re: [Orgmode] Re: latex export and beamer columns

2009-11-26 Thread Eric S Fraga
At Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:52:04 +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: > > I've just tried something simplier and IMHO more flexible (widths). > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > * The Title > ** The Section > *** The Frame > #+latex: \begin{columns}[t] > #+latex: \column{

[Orgmode] Re: latex export and beamer columns

2009-11-25 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Eric S Fraga writes: > Recently, in September, there was a discussion about exporting org > files to latex using the beamer class and generating slides with > multiple columns: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/17546 (...) > So, for instance, this will generate a slide with two col

[Orgmode] Re: latex export and beamer columns

2009-11-23 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Eric and Carsten, Eric S Fraga wrote: > At Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:34:18 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >> Anything missing in Org that we should implement to support this better? > > At the moment, the only thing that is missing in org-mode to beamer is some > way to specify arguments to the \f

[Orgmode] Re: latex export and beamer columns

2009-11-22 Thread Eric S Fraga
At Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:29:47 -0500, Matt Lundin wrote: [...] > I've only used Beamer a few times, but I use the "center" environment to > center images. Could you perhaps use the following? > > , > | In a double pipe heat exchanger, > | > | #+begin_center > | [[file:images/double-pipe-heat-

[Orgmode] Re: latex export and beamer columns

2009-11-22 Thread Matt Lundin
Eric S Fraga writes: >> At Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:34:18 +0100, >> Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> > Anything missing in Org that we should implement to support this >> > better? > > Actually, going through the set of lectures I am currently preparing, > I am finding that there is one thing missing that