> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:59:21 +0200, Carsten Dominik
> said:
CD> One problem I notices: I think multiple lines starting with ": "
CD> must be seen as one block, most backends will need this.
Yep. It was, err... not on my todo list because I failed to write it
down. But I did realiz
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:04:38 +0200, Carsten Dominik
> said:
CD> org-export-xxx.el
Fine by me. I'll use org-export-generic.
--
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
and much more difficult to find." -- Terry Pratchett
__
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:59:14 -0400, Bernt Hansen
said:
BH> Isn't the filename (org-generic.el) well, um, too generic? If
it's
BH> export-related wouldn't something like org-export-generic.el be
better?
BH> (or maybe even org-export-too
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:59:14 -0400, Bernt Hansen said:
BH> Isn't the filename (org-generic.el) well, um, too generic? If it's
BH> export-related wouldn't something like org-export-generic.el be better?
BH> (or maybe even org-export-tools.el? )
Well, I was psuedo-modeling it after the exis
Wes Hardaker writes:
> I have a bunch of random things that I'd like to export org stuff too
> and it seemed to me that much of the work of writing code to export
> stuff from org-mode into external documents could be conquered by simple
> string specifiers. So yesterday I hacked something toget
