Re: [Orgmode] Re: formatting times as HH:MM with leading zeros

2010-01-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: p.s. 'M-x occur RET Non-nil means, RET' in org-agenda.el shows 33 instances of where a comma has been placed after the word 'means'. I think this is wrong, and a misinterpretation of the advice from elisp.info: * The documentation string fo

Re: [Orgmode] Re: formatting times as HH:MM with leading zeros

2010-01-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Applied, thanks. - Carsten On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: Thanks Carsten. P.S. I know you have signed some copyright papers. Do they cover all of Emacs? yes, all of emacs. Here is patch and suggested changelog. thanks! Stephen p.s. 'M-x occur RET Non-nil means, RET' i

Re: [Orgmode] Re: formatting times as HH:MM with leading zeros

2010-01-20 Thread Stephen Eglen
Thanks Carsten. > P.S. I know you have signed some copyright papers. Do they cover all > of Emacs? yes, all of emacs. Here is patch and suggested changelog. thanks! Stephen p.s. 'M-x occur RET Non-nil means, RET' in org-agenda.el shows 33 instances of where a comma has been placed after the w

Re: [Orgmode] Re: formatting times as HH:MM with leading zeros

2010-01-20 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 20, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Stephen Eglen wrote: If I might chime in, I would request that this change be implemented as an option, not as a default. I greatly prefer the display method as it stands. Dear Matt, certainly -- I can submit a short patch with a variable to keep the current be

[Orgmode] Re: formatting times as HH:MM with leading zeros

2010-01-20 Thread Stephen Eglen
> If I might chime in, I would request that this change be implemented as > an option, not as a default. I greatly prefer the display method as it > stands. Dear Matt, certainly -- I can submit a short patch with a variable to keep the current behaviour as default. ___

[Orgmode] Re: formatting times as HH:MM with leading zeros

2010-01-20 Thread Matt Lundin
Hi Stephen, Stephen Eglen writes: > Just a small suggestion here. In the agenda, an entry like: > * <2010-01-20 Wed 09:00-09:30> test > > gets formatted as follows: > > Wednesday 20 January 2010 >8:00.. > test:9:00- 9:30 test > 10:00