On Aug 15, 2007, at 18:57, Leo wrote:
On 2007-08-09 06:05 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
In this case, I feel there should a consistent definition of key
bindings. One excellent example is vc, it is just so easy to
remember.
What do you mean with "consistent definition of key bindings".
I
On 2007-08-09 06:05 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> In this case, I feel there should a consistent definition of key
>> bindings. One excellent example is vc, it is just so easy to remember.
>
> What do you mean with "consistent definition of key bindings".
>
>> I have been an regular user of org,
On Jul 28, 2007, at 20:35, Leo wrote:
On 2007-07-28 12:43 +0100, Bastien wrote:
Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These key bindings are to move from one set of the TODO items to
another, which intuitively are a vertical motion.
Well, I don't share this intuition.
Since S- cycles through TO
On 2007-07-28 12:43 +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> These key bindings are to move from one set of the TODO items to
>> another, which intuitively are a vertical motion.
>
> Well, I don't share this intuition.
>
> Since S- cycles through TODO states, it's consistent to
