Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2008-01-16 09:55 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> There are enough reasons for doing a complete re-write of org-mode
>> and designing the stuff top-down. But I would need someone to pay
>> my salary for half a year or so - I guess this is not likely to happen.
On 2008-01-16 09:55 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> There are enough reasons for doing a complete re-write of org-mode
> and designing the stuff top-down. But I would need someone to pay
> my salary for half a year or so - I guess this is not likely to happen.
>
> :-)
Can FSF support this?
--
.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Thanks Carsten, that is awesome!
I'm afraid some of us could complain anyway because this is not really
clean.
Maybe you can keep the clean version on your list for "later"...
There are enough reasons for doing a complete re-write of org-
Thanks Carsten, that is awesome!
I'm afraid some of us could complain anyway because this is not really
clean.
Maybe you can keep the clean version on your list for "later"...
rainer
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
>
> On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> any chanc
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
any chance to get that the todo state item formatted?
rainer
Hmm, yeah, I can hack it. The clean way would be to include this into
the
prefix format, but this is more work. So I am just putting a new
variable
into the ne
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> that is currently not possible.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Jan 15, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I would like to format the agenda lines. I know there is a variable
>> for that
>> but I cannot find the point where I can configure the length
