Hi Richard,
I am accepting the patch, with one small change:
The new variable is called `org-hierarchical-checkbox-statistics'
and works the other way round, default t.
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:
This is the fixed patch, it actually works on my real
The behaviour of the [/] token counter all of it decendents and not
just it's immediate children. I under stand it's not ideal in the
case of [-] tokens or position that could get [-] tokens, but I still
prefer being able to collapse a list and still being able to tell
roughly how much is left to
On May 9, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
That's true, but to be honest, before I knew about the [-] feature, I
used [/] tokens on list items with checkboxes under them. I'd
consider this an improvement.
Consider what exactly an improvement?
- Carsten
Edd
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at
That's true, but to be honest, before I knew about the [-] feature, I
used [/] tokens on list items with checkboxes under them. I'd
consider this an improvement.
Edd
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Carsten Dominik
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> your patch works, almost.
>
> Where it goes wrong is he
Hi Richard,
your patch works, almost.
Where it goes wrong is here:
* test [3/6]
- one
- [X] two
- three
- [-] four
- [X] five
- [-] six
- seven
- [ ] eight
- [X] nine
The statistics cookie talks about 6 checkboxes below it,
but in fact there are only 4, two (
I'll have to see if I can get this to work. I think I was one of the
one that ask for the old behavior and have missed it ever since it was
changed.
Thanks!
Edd
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Richard KLINDA wrote:
> This is the fixed patch, it actually works on my real life org files so
> thi
This is the fixed patch, it actually works on my real life org files so
this has a slight chance of being right.
>
diff --git a/lisp/org-list.el b/lisp/org-list.el
index 7469add..872dddf 100644
--- a/lisp/org-list.el
+++ b/l
