Samuel Wales writes:
> The bug has been fixed, so the following is moot.
>
> Ah, but he didn't . :) Hence my question. :)
>
> I appreciated the effort to help, but I was wondering what he was
> trying to say, because he used strings instead of regexps and he used
> different settings for both
In other words, I was wondering why he reported the failure to
reproduce a bug that I did not report on.
Perhaps he had some other point he was making. Or perhaps he was
confused about what the bug was.
Hence my question.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing lis
The bug has been fixed, so the following is moot.
Ah, but he didn't . :) Hence my question. :)
I appreciated the effort to help, but I was wondering what he was
trying to say, because he used strings instead of regexps and he used
different settings for both variables. The bug was with regexp
Samuel Wales wrote:
>Why is that important?
Noorul tried to reproduce the bug, but couldn't. Trying to reproduce
a reported bug is (sometimes) important for the developers.
Best,
-- David
--
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
Jabber dmj...@jabber.org
Email. dm...@ictsoc.de
pgpSyHKCS9ak5.p
Why is that important?
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Samuel Wales writes:
> Meaning?
I meant,
I have both these variables set as nil
org-agenda-search-view-always-boolean
org-agenda-search-view-force-full-words
and then in org agenda buffer. I typed M-x org-search-view and then
typed in "faster than" which displayed the expected filtered result
