I'm not sure if this is the case for others as well, but I care more
about the number of lines of whitespace preceding headings in folded
org files. I would find an option like...
(setq org-preceding-blank-lines
'((org-level-1 . 2)
(org-level-2 . 1)
(list-item . 1)
I'm not sure if this is the case for others as well, but I care more
about the number of lines of whitespace preceding headings in folded
org files. I would find an option like...
(setq org-preceding-blank-lines
'((org-level-1 . 2)
(org-level-2 . 1)
(list-item . 1)
On Dec 12, 2007 4:17 PM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. Considering an option like:
>
> (setq org-allow-blank-lines ;; or org-allow-max-blank-lines
> '((org-level-1 . 2)
>(org-level-2 . 1)
>(list-item . 1)
>(t . delete))
>
> The rule for
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Phil Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
The problem is that there is no way to tell that the two blank lines
after "** Blah blah" are part of "** Blah blah" or part of "* Some
stuff".
>>>
>>> [..
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Phil Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> The problem is that there is no way to tell that the two blank lines
>>> after "** Blah blah" are part of "** Blah blah" or part of "* Some
>>> stuff".
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> I suffer this prob
