On Dec 19, 2009, at 5:35 AM, Mueen Nawaz wrote:
On 12/17/09 13:26, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Yes, so that the search only continues after that entry. But yes, you
are right, this can fail for the final entry in a file.
Try
'(when (org-entry-is-done) (outline-next-heading) (point))
See
On 12/17/09 13:26, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Yes, so that the search only continues after that entry. But yes, you
are right, this can fail for the final entry in a file.
Try
'(when (org-entry-is-done) (outline-next-heading) (point))
Seems to work.
Also, I'm pretty weak with Emacs Lisp
On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Mueen Nawaz wrote:
On 12/16/09 03:37, Carsten Dominik wrote:
This is what skip conditions are for. Here is an entry for
org-agenda-custom-commands which does this for the specific
"Jack" example:
("X" "Tags match ignoring done stuff" tags "Jack"
((org-agenda-skip-
On 12/16/09 03:37, Carsten Dominik wrote:
This is what skip conditions are for. Here is an entry for
org-agenda-custom-commands which does this for the specific
"Jack" example:
("X" "Tags match ignoring done stuff" tags "Jack"
((org-agenda-skip-function
'(and
(org-entry-is-done-p)
(outline-next-
Mueen Nawaz writes:
> On 12/15/09 21:26, Matt Lundin wrote:
>> Provided DONE and RETURNED are inactive todos than the following should
>> suffice:
>>
>> C-a M Jack [RET]
>
> I think you meant C-c a M Jack [RET]
Yes indeed. I'm still practicing typing out the notation for
keybindings. I sup
On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Mueen Nawaz wrote:
On 12/15/09 21:26, Matt Lundin wrote:
Provided DONE and RETURNED are inactive todos than the following
should
suffice:
C-a M Jack [RET]
I think you meant C-c a M Jack [RET]
It actually does filter out inactive TODO's, but I actuall
On 12/15/09 21:26, Matt Lundin wrote:
Provided DONE and RETURNED are inactive todos than the following should
suffice:
C-a M Jack [RET]
I think you meant C-c a M Jack [RET]
It actually does filter out inactive TODO's, but I actually wanted to
do C-c a m Jack [RET]. I don't want to l
Mueen Nawaz writes:
> In the docs (10.3.3 Matching tags and properties), I see ways to do
> tag searches that can also search TODO states.
>
> Can I also search TODO levels? For example, in one file covered by the
> agenda, I use the usual DONE to denote done. In another, which is
> focused on si
