Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Having a way to undefine a property would be good in general I think.
>
> This does now work, the property value "nil" will now be interpreted as
> explicit undefine of a property.
Thanks!!
-Bernt
_
On Jun 25, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
Question: what is the proper way to get a NIL into a property? Are
we
to use () instead of "nil"? Or are property values always
interpreted
as strings?
Apologi
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> Question: what is the proper way to get a NIL into a property? Are
>> we
>> to use () instead of "nil"? Or are property values always interpreted
>> as strings?
>>
>> Apologies in advance if this is a stupid ques
