Hi Dan,
thanks for doing such a careful job. I applied all three parts.
- Carsten
On Sep 5, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Dan,
OK, I have now applied the patch. If you don't mind, could
you please double-check the commit?
[Re.: commit 4b6988bf36cb458c
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> OK, I have now applied the patch. If you don't mind, could
> you please double-check the commit?
[Re.: commit 4b6988bf36cb458c9d113ee4332e016990c1eb04 ]
Thanks Carsten, I looked over the commit and it looked good. However
after using it a bit over the last
Hi Dan,
OK, I have now applied the patch. If you don't mind, could
you please double-check the commit?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Dan,
I am now finally looking at your patch.
A few questions:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:03 PM
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I am now finally looking at your patch.
>
> A few questions:
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
>
>> Dan Davison writes:
>>
>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>>
Hi Dan,
thank you for studying and describing these issues, and for
>
Hi Dan,
I am now finally looking at your patch.
A few questions:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Dan Davison writes:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Dan,
thank you for studying and describing these issues, and for
proposing
a patch.
I have noticed a bug in the patch I p
Dan Davison writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> thank you for studying and describing these issues, and for proposing
>> a patch.
I have noticed a bug in the patch I proposed: the configuration of the
edit buffer for saving must be done only after C-c ', and not for
example whe
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> thank you for studying and describing these issues, and for proposing
> a patch.
>
> I am not sure that the implementation you offer is the cleanest
> possibile, I definitely do not want to attach a file to this temporary
> editing buffer.
Just to be clear,
Hi Dan,
thank you for studying and describing these issues, and for proposing
a patch.
I am not sure that the implementation you offer is the cleanest
possibile, I definitely do not want to attach a file to this
temporary editing buffer. It is probably better to install
a kill-buffer-hook to
