Max Mikhanosha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seeing "INPROGRESS Finish coding feature X" instead does not
> discourage me as I don't have to be reminded that I had already wasted
> 2 weeks on it, it just reminds me to continue to work on it today.
I get this point.
The only problem I can see wit
At Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:18:12 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> What I don't understand is this:
>
> If you have an item scheduled, and if you don't mark it DONE, it
> will be in the list of scheduled items on every future date until
> you finally mark it done. It seems to me that this does
> *auto
Hi Max,
I can follow your arguments about space used up by the extra headlines,
and I can also see why you'd want the entries mixed.
What I don't understand is this:
If you have an item scheduled, and if you don't mark it DONE, it will be
in the list of scheduled items on every future date unti
Responding to my own email, because I accidentally deleted Carsten
response.
Carsten suggested that I check the block agenda functionality to see
if it already does the same thing. The block agenda have the following
little quirks which made me implement my own solution instead:
Example of block