Re: [Orgmode] Re: PATCH: include in-progress/started todos into daily agenda

2007-09-27 Thread Bastien
Max Mikhanosha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Seeing "INPROGRESS Finish coding feature X" instead does not > discourage me as I don't have to be reminded that I had already wasted > 2 weeks on it, it just reminds me to continue to work on it today. I get this point. The only problem I can see wit

Re: [Orgmode] Re: PATCH: include in-progress/started todos into daily agenda

2007-09-27 Thread Max Mikhanosha
At Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:18:12 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > What I don't understand is this: > > If you have an item scheduled, and if you don't mark it DONE, it > will be in the list of scheduled items on every future date until > you finally mark it done. It seems to me that this does > *auto

Re: [Orgmode] Re: PATCH: include in-progress/started todos into daily agenda

2007-09-27 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Max, I can follow your arguments about space used up by the extra headlines, and I can also see why you'd want the entries mixed. What I don't understand is this: If you have an item scheduled, and if you don't mark it DONE, it will be in the list of scheduled items on every future date unti

[Orgmode] Re: PATCH: include in-progress/started todos into daily agenda

2007-09-27 Thread Max Mikhanosha
Responding to my own email, because I accidentally deleted Carsten response. Carsten suggested that I check the block agenda functionality to see if it already does the same thing. The block agenda have the following little quirks which made me implement my own solution instead: Example of block