Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and taskpaper

2008-04-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Leo wrote: On 2008-04-01 09:03 +0100, Russell Adams wrote: As to tables, I would miss them dearly. They aren't immediately related to folding outlines or schedules, but I frequently use short tables for summing information and the exported view is nice. The `tabl

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and taskpaper

2008-04-02 Thread Leo
On 2008-04-01 09:03 +0100, Russell Adams wrote: > As to tables, I would miss them dearly. They aren't immediately > related to folding outlines or schedules, but I frequently use short > tables for summing information and the exported view is nice. The `table' functionality can turn into a new spr

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and taskpaper

2008-04-01 Thread Uwe Jochum
Hm, Message from Apr 01 2008 (11:18): > Hm, reading all the answers to this aprils fools gets me a bit worried. > Nobody seems to see the joke and everybody seems to agree that org-mode > is too bloated. sometimes the joke reveals a truth. Sometimes only the reflection of a truth. Let's wait unt

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and taskpaper

2008-04-01 Thread Tassilo Horn
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Carsten, > I hope that you can all agree with my conclusion. If not, than I am > confident that with time you will realize just how important today's > decision was. I do agree with you. I only use a tiny subset of org's features: Outlining, TODOs

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode and taskpaper

2008-04-01 Thread Uwe Jochum
Carsten, Message from Apr 01 2008 (09:26): > Reading this thread has really cost me a lot of sleep, but > I have now come to the conclusion that we need to turn > the tide and downscope Org-mode significantly. this is what I wrote to you some months ago. Some say it is a symbol of success when a