On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:53, Tassilo Horn wrote:
But I've discovered another minor glitch. When I toggle from CANCELLED
to TODO the CLOSED timestamp gets removed, which is a good thing. When
I use C-c C-c T RET to do the same the timestamp persists.
Fixed, thanks.
- Carsten
__
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:53, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
This looks very odd, as if your setup of org-tags-list is the wrong
way round.
Hm, I use a CVS emacs 3 hours old, but org-tags-list is not known
there. I guess you mean org-tag-alist, ri
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
> This looks very odd, as if your setup of org-tags-list is the wrong
> way round.
Hm, I use a CVS emacs 3 hours old, but org-tags-list is not known
there. I guess you mean org-tag-alist, right?
> I should be
>
> (setq org-tags-list
> '(
On Aug 31, 2007, at 11:36, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument sequencep 97)
org-add-props(97 nil face nil)
byte-code("\fÆÇ!q È É ÊÆÇ!!Ë
ÌÍ \nÎ$ÌÏ \fÐ$Ñ!Ò /
\"[EMAIL PROTECTED]@7Ö84A4A9æÛ7Û7!
ÜU¦Ý§ÔÖO!:Þ:;\"¿Þ:<\"ÙÞ2;\"ÑÞ2<\"Ý2T2¿:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
>>> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t) WAITING(w) | CANCELED(c) DONE(d)
>>
>> Is it possible to set those globally via `org-todo-keywords', too?
>> If yes, what's the syntax?
>
> You can just write the keywords like "TODO(t)" in the global list,
> tha
On Aug 30, 2007, at 17:10, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t) WAITING(w) | CANCELED(c) DONE(d)
Is it possible to set those globally via `org-todo-keywords', too? If
yes, what's the syntax?
You can just write the keywords
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t) WAITING(w) | CANCELED(c) DONE(d)
Is it possible to set those globally via `org-todo-keywords', too? If
yes, what's the syntax?
Bye,
Tassilo
--
Jesus can walk on water, but Chuck Norris can walk on Jesus.
__
That is a really stupid little mistake, fixed now in 5.07a.
Sorry about the messup.
- Carsten
On Aug 30, 2007, at 15:26, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
- Some People use TODO states more like tags. For them the
TODO keywords mark special states and the
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Some People use TODO states more like tags. For them the
> TODO keywords mark special states and they like to quickly
> switch between states in arbitrary sequence. The standard
> TODO interface is not perfect for this, because it ass
