On 9/24/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is, entries with no priority are sorted at the same spot as
> > entries with the default priority - and entries with lower than
> > default priority are sorted below them.
>
> This is correct.
Indeed. Sorry.
--
With best regards,
Dm
On Sep 24, 2007, at 4:02, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
But Nuutti offered to interpret the absent priority as the default
one, and I prefer to differentiate between the unrated entries and
the entries with a priority.
If I haven't understood this completely wrong, it *is* int
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> But Nuutti offered to interpret the absent priority as the default
> one, and I prefer to differentiate between the unrated entries and
> the entries with a priority.
If I haven't understood this completely wrong, it *is* interpreted as
the same!
That is, entries with no pr
