[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Darlan, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote: > I agree that it is useful to have an easy way to specify one or more options > for every frame, but from the beamer manual I understand that these options > where created for specific cases and IMHO org shouldn't include any frame > option by default.

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote: I agree that it is useful to have an easy way to specify one or more options for every frame, but from the beamer manual I understand that these options where created for specific cases and IMHO org shouldn't include any frame

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
I agree that it is useful to have an easy way to specify one or more options for every frame, but from the beamer manual I understand that these options where created for specific cases and IMHO org shouldn't include any frame option by default. About the fragile option, the beamer manual tells y

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote: At last, I have a small feature request that would help organizing the information among the slides. Right now you can use Alt+up/down arrow to move a list item in a heading, but org does not allow passing beyond a heading limit.

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten and Darlan, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote: >>> Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >> there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options >>>

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote: I don't think org-mode should try to detect when to use any of the frame options in beamer. This could get into the way more then helping, specially the allowframebreaks option. Do you also think I should not try to add the fr

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
I don't think org-mode should try to detect when to use any of the frame options in beamer. This could get into the way more then helping, specially the allowframebreaks option. In fact, the beamer manual tells you not to use the allowframebreaks option except for long bibliographies (well, it al

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >> I still got the same "black-and-white" buffer... > > my mistake So... You're just a plain human? ;-)) I'm falling from high. > fixed now. Yep. It does work! Comment about this `allowframebreaks' story: I've just seen, using the defaults (and Madrid),

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Properties are empty. When not typing `e b', I just end up with: --8<---cut here

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Properties are empty. When not typing `e b', I just end up with: --8<---cut here---start->8--- ** DB

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Sebastian, my mistake, fixed now. - Carsten On Jan 7, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: #

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: > > #+BIND will do the trick, it was made just for this. Though, I experience a

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: #+BIND will do the trick, it was made just for this. As said previously, yes, it does work for the exporting to beamer TeX

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> >>> #+BIND will do the trick, it was made just for this. >> >> As said previously, yes, it does work for the exporting to beamer TeX file. >> >> Though, I experience a bigger prob

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> >> Properties are empty. >> >> When not typing `e b', I just end up with: >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> ** DB

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options When setting it into Emacs, great, it DOES WORK as expected! Though

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options >> >> When setting it into Emacs, great, it DOES WORK as expected! >> >> Though, I believe this is more a setting of the

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-07 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options >> >> When setting it into Emacs, great, it DOES WORK as expected! >> >> Though, I believe this is more a setting of the

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Trying to add the property on the level-2 item named "DB", as you can see in my "lossage": --8<---cut here---start->8--- M-x o r g - b e a m e r m o M-x C-c C-x C-c e b e e [ a l l w o o w f r a

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: PS- An idea: wouldn't it be good (*iff* easily feasible) to load org-beamer-mode when opening an Org file whose LaTeX class is beamer? That could be don

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options When setting it into Emacs, great, it DOES WORK as expected! Though, I believe this is more a setting of the document itself, instead of one

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options When setting it into Emacs, great, it DOES WORK as expected! Though, I believe this is more a setting of the document itself, instead of one customization in my own `.emacs' file. I would rather like

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Shouldn't `("@" "\\alert{%s}" nil)' be added by default? >>> >>> Hmm, I am not sure, because \alert is of course not de

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> >>> PS- An idea: wouldn't it be good (*iff* easily feasible) to load >>> org-beamer-mode when opening an Org file whose LaTeX class is beamer? >> >> That could be done, but you can also set the startup option.

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: PS- An idea: wouldn't it be good (*iff* easily feasible) to load org-beamer-mode when opening an Org file whose LaTeX class is beamer? That could be done, but you can also set the startup option. But yes, it is one more think to remember...

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Shouldn't `("@" "\\alert{%s}" nil)' be added by default? Hmm, I am not sure, because \alert is of course not defined in normal LaTeX export. And ma

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> >> Shouldn't `("@" "\\alert{%s}" nil)' be added by default? > > Hmm, I am not sure, because \alert is of course not defined in normal LaTeX > export. And maybe it would even be better to redifine bold emph

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Sebastien, there is now a new option org-beamer-frame-default-options, and the automatically generated to will be wrapped into a frame with title. - Carsten On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Hi Eric, Christian, Carsten and all, Eric S Fraga wrote: At Wed, 06 Jan 2010

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Christian Lasarczyk wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >> - How to get the TOC repeated when changing of section, with the new item highlighted? See my manual essay ;-) >>> >>> I don't know! Isn't this something that can be

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Eric, Christian, Carsten and all, Eric S Fraga wrote: > At Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:46:45 +0100, Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> >> The few things I'm tackling right now are: >> >> - How to get a TOC with a frame title, without having to add it explicitly? > > I think you need to add it explicitly with \

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote: Shouldn't `("@" "\\alert{%s}" nil)' be added by default? Hmm, I am not sure, because \alert is of course not defined in normal LaTeX export. And maybe it would even be better to redifine bold emphasis as alert for beamer export?

Re: [Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 6, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Christian Lasarczyk wrote: Hi Sébastien and Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: - How to get the TOC repeated when changing of section, with the new item highlighted? See my manual essay ;-) I don't know! Isn't this something that can be done with beamer themes

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Christian Lasarczyk
Hi Sébastien and Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> - How to get the TOC repeated when changing of section, with the new >> item >> highlighted? See my manual essay ;-) > > I don't know! Isn't this something that can be done with beamer themes? > I have no idea. > \AtBeginSection[] % Do noth

[Orgmode] Re: New beamer support

2010-01-06 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Sébastien Vauban wrote: >> >> The few things I'm tackling right now are: >> >> - How to get a TOC with a frame title, without having to add it explicitly? > > What would you like to have the LaTeX to be like? See the line I added manually in the example Org fi