On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
At Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:27:57 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:30 PM, René wrote:
Unfortunately, in this case Emacs doesn't fontify those lines as if
they were comments.
It does now.
- Carsten
Carsten, thanks for this.
At Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:27:57 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:30 PM, René wrote:
> > Unfortunately, in this case Emacs doesn't fontify those lines as if
> > they were comments.
>
> It does now.
>
> - Carsten
Carsten, thanks for this. It works perfectly.
But this leads to m
On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:30 PM, René wrote:
Eric S Fraga ucl.ac.uk> writes:
At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:10:41 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
At column 0 - probably not.
1. first
2. second
#+ comment about second item
#+ Another comment goes here
3. third
4. fourth
The #+ comment probably isn't o
Eric S Fraga ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:10:41 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> > At column 0 - probably not.
> >
> > 1. first
> > 2. second
> > #+ comment about second item
> > #+ Another comment goes here
> > 3. third
> > 4. fourth
> >
> > The #+ comment probably isn't
At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:10:41 -0400,
Bernt Hansen wrote:
> At column 0 - probably not.
>
> 1. first
> 2. second
> #+ comment about second item
> #+ Another comment goes here
> 3. third
> 4. fourth
>
> The #+ comment probably isn't officially supported either... it just
> happens to wor
Eric S Fraga writes:
> At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:52:13 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> If you're actually trying to make the comment not export this seems to
>> work for me
>>
>> 1. first
>> 2. second
>> #+ comment about second item
>> 3. third
>> 4. fourth
>>
>> -Bernt
>
> and in fact it works
At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:52:13 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> If you're actually trying to make the comment not export this seems to
> work for me
>
> 1. first
> 2. second
> #+ comment about second item
> 3. third
> 4. fourth
>
> -Bernt
and in fact it works without the + sign and that's what I
Eric S Fraga writes:
> At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:16:14 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> René writes:
>> > Is there a way to insert comments in a plain list without breaking it into
>> > two
>> > distinct lists?
>
> I've run into exactly this problem in the past few days, preparing a
> document, inten
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:32 PM, René wrote:
Bernt Hansen norang.ca> writes:
You can ident the comment like this
1. first
2. second
# comment about second item
3. third
4. fourth
Unfortunately in this case your comment gets exported since the `#'
is indented.
Of course one doesn't wa
Bernt Hansen norang.ca> writes:
> You can ident the comment like this
>
> 1. first
> 2. second
>
> # comment about second item
>
> 3. third
> 4. fourth
Unfortunately in this case your comment gets exported since the `#' is indented.
Of course one doesn't want the comments to appear in
At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:16:14 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> René writes:
> > Is there a way to insert comments in a plain list without breaking it into
> > two
> > distinct lists?
I've run into exactly this problem in the past few days, preparing a
document, intended for export to a variety of for
René writes:
> Is there a way to insert comments in a plain list without breaking it into two
> distinct lists?
>
> Such a list:
>
> 1. first
> 2. second
> # comment about second item
> 3. third
> 4. fourth
>
> is actually considered as
>
> 1. first
> 2. second
> # comment about second it
12 matches
Mail list logo
