On 2008-06-12, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But anyway, if you're the sole author, you can definitely move to a
>> GPL+GFDL dual-license when you so please, but I guess I still need
>> to add that IANAL...
>
> I don't know what this last sentence means.
the "I Am Not A Lawyer" par
Hi Sebastian,
On Jun 11, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Seb wrote:
On 2008-06-10, Dominik, C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be happy to dual-license the manual. Does anyone know what
piece of text I would have to put there? Does anyone know if the
GFDL prohbits me, the author, to add GPL as a second
On 2008-06-10, Dominik, C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be happy to dual-license the manual. Does anyone know what
> piece of text I would have to put there? Does anyone know if the
> GFDL prohbits me, the author, to add GPL as a second free license?
> I sure hope not.
> [...]
> To be hon
On 2008-06-09, Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just a question:
>
> When I follow the link you mentioned in your first mail I read this:
>
> 8<---
> It should be noted that this does not imply any hostility towards the
> Free Software Foundation, and does not mean that GFDL doc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Seb
Sent: Sun 6/8/2008 6:31 PM
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts
On 2008-06-06, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-06, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is t
Hello Seb,
just a question:
When I follow the link you mentioned in your first mail I read this:
8<---
It should be noted that this does not imply any hostility towards the
Free Software Foundation, and does not mean that GFDL documentation
should not be considered free enough by othe
On 2008-06-06, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-06, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any way that the documentation could be dual-licensed under
>> the GPL too ?
>
> or that the "Front-Cover provision" be removed altogether :)
while awaiting an answer on this, I think I will p
On 2008-06-06, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way that the documentation could be dual-licensed under
> the GPL too ?
or that the "Front-Cover provision" be removed altogether :)
Cheers,
--Seb
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember:
