Bastien writes:
Hi Bastien,
>> with all those troubles, what's the point in `org-modules' anyway?
>> Are there any benefits over plain requires in users' .emacs files
>> except the nice and explanatory customize interface?
>
> One advantage I see is that org.el can define a default set of loaded
On Sep 7, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Bastien wrote:
Hi Tassilo,
Tassilo Horn writes:
with all those troubles, what's the point in `org-modules' anyway?
Are
there any benefits over plain requires in users' .emacs files
except the
nice and explanatory customize interface?
One advantage I see is
Hi Tassilo,
Tassilo Horn writes:
> with all those troubles, what's the point in `org-modules' anyway? Are
> there any benefits over plain requires in users' .emacs files except the
> nice and explanatory customize interface?
One advantage I see is that org.el can define a default set of loaded
Hi Carsten,
with all those troubles, what's the point in `org-modules' anyway? Are
there any benefits over plain requires in users' .emacs files except the
nice and explanatory customize interface?
Bye,
Tassilo
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Samuel Wales
>> Date: September 7, 2009 4:36:
