On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:55 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Still, if it is "common practice" to call this outermost
container "container" instead of "content", I would not
object to rename it.
"content" (see some drupal templates and Org-mode) or "wrapper" (see
OP)
or "wr
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Still, if it is "common practice" to call this outermost
> container "container" instead of "content", I would not
> object to rename it.
"content" (see some drupal templates and Org-mode) or "wrapper" (see OP)
or "wrap" (see some CMSs, e.g. typolight) or ...
???
-
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>> I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or whatever
>>> other name we can find a consensus for.
>>
>> Completely agreed. This is not an important problem. Any
On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or
whatever other name we can find a consensus for.
I think I would object to removing it alltogether, I cannot see the
benefit of doing that.
On the other
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or
> whatever other name we can find a consensus for.
>
> I think I would object to removing it alltogether, I cannot see the
> benefit of doing that.
>
> On the other hand, I cannot really see ths issue here, b
Sébastien Vauban writes:
> I took a free CSS template at:
>
> http://www.free-css.com/free-css-templates/page2/minisite-pro.php
Why don't you adjust the template???
Why should anyone Org-mode to match an arbitrary freely available
CSS-template?
Sebastian
__
On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Sebastian Rose writes:
Could you describe here what's the problem with the element?
This was put in recently on a users request. If you don't want to
use it
for you're CSS styling, just don't.
In my opinion, a minor issue with the new
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Could you describe here what's the problem with the element?
>
> This was put in recently on a users request. If you don't want to use it
> for you're CSS styling, just don't.
In my opinion, a minor issue with the new default is
that it is used used to wrap the entire
Could you describe here what's the problem with the element?
This was put in recently on a users request. If you don't want to use it
for you're CSS styling, just don't.
One way to gear the export results to your needs exactly might be the
usage of XSL (which you could use with the XHTML or Doc
2009/3/30 Sébastien Vauban
>
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Trying to use free CSS templates for some Web site, I have layout problems
> >> with the current export to HTML, as a first `' is
> >> hard-coded
>
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Trying to use free CSS templates for some Web site, I have layout problems
>> with the current export to HTML, as a first `' is
>> hard-coded
>> into the resulting Web page.
>>
>> Could you r
Hi Roc Lee,
Roc lee wrote:
> 2009/3/30 roc lee
>>> Could you remove that line, and its closing tag from `(insert
>>> "\n\n\n\n"))' (in function `org-export-as-html') so
>>> that we have a completely naked BODY, that the user can fill at its own
>>> freedom via the preamble/postamble?
>
> There is
12 matches
Mail list logo
