On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Leo wrote:
On 2009-09-14 20:13 +0100, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Emacs 21.4 is nearly 4 years old! Org-mode uses quite a bunch of more
or less recent emacs features, so getting it fully working would be
quite a hassle with a lot of compatibility code.
That said, I thi
On 2009-09-14 20:13 +0100, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Emacs 21.4 is nearly 4 years old! Org-mode uses quite a bunch of more
> or less recent emacs features, so getting it fully working would be
> quite a hassle with a lot of compatibility code.
I agree.
Org is moving forward extremely fast and the mai
2009/9/14 Tassilo Horn :
> "Jing Su @ Gmail" writes:
>
> Hi Jing,
>
>> I fully understand that Emacs 21 is way out of date. However, since
>> RHEL is one of the mainstream commercial distros, and is common on
>> servers, it would be great if org-mode can be consistent with such
>> ``industrial sta
"Jing Su @ Gmail" writes:
Hi Jing,
> I fully understand that Emacs 21 is way out of date. However, since
> RHEL is one of the mainstream commercial distros, and is common on
> servers, it would be great if org-mode can be consistent with such
> ``industrial standard'' (which is always way out of
