Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, I am still not convinced, in particular about adding new syntax.
>>>
>>> One thing I could imagine though, is this:
>>> If an entry has checkboxes, always put those i
On Apr 20, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hmmm, I am still not convinced, in particular about adding new
syntax.
One thing I could imagine though, is this:
If an entry has checkboxes, always put those into the cookie, not the
children.
Or maybe
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hmmm, I am still not convinced, in particular about adding new syntax.
>
> One thing I could imagine though, is this:
> If an entry has checkboxes, always put those into the cookie, not the
> children.
> Or maybe a variable, stating your preference for this.
Hmmm, I am still not convinced, in particular about adding new syntax.
One thing I could imagine though, is this:
If an entry has checkboxes, always put those into the cookie, not the
children.
Or maybe a variable, stating your preference for this. This would at
least give predictable behavi
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
>
>> Imagine you are compiling a document where you need contributions from
>> others. You could make a todo item for this with checkboxes for every
>> chapter planned (or for every author you expect input fr
On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
there is no way currently to force a cookie either way.
I think the the right solution is to modify the structure, so
that the check boxes are only in entries without children.
Seems to me that this is al
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> there is no way currently to force a cookie either way.
>
> I think the the right solution is to modify the structure, so
> that the check boxes are only in entries without children.
> Seems to me that this is always possible - in your case
> you could just c
