On May 21, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Out of interested: is patchwork integrated with the git repo, so that it
> could automatically check if a patch was applied? And even better: see
> that this patch was now reverted and thus shouldn't be listed as
> "accepted" anymore?
No, it is
John Wiegley writes:
>> So, John -- yes, could you revert that please as the issue has been
>> fixed subsequent to 6.36.
>
> Done.
Out of interested: is patchwork integrated with the git repo, so that it
could automatically check if a patch was applied? And even better: see
that this patch was
On May 20, 2010, at 11:41 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
> So, John -- yes, could you revert that please as the issue has been
> fixed subsequent to 6.36.
Done.
John
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgm
Dan Davison wrote:
> Could someone tell me how to find out which commit corresponds to a
> certain release (e.g. 6.36c)?
>
Do ``git fetch --tags'', then ``git tag'' to see the list of tags:
...
release_6.35i
release_6.36
release_6.36c
test_5.21_tagging
Then ``git show release_6.36c'':
,---
Russell Adams writes:
> FYI,
>
> That was from a ML post, I cannot take credit. Thanks to who posted
> it, it helped me out!
No problem.
> In response to the other, I just downloaded 6.36c from the website
> *today* and had to apply that patch to make it work.
OK, that makes sense, as I've jus
FYI,
That was from a ML post, I cannot take credit. Thanks to who posted
it, it helped me out!
In response to the other, I just downloaded 6.36c from the website
*today* and had to apply that patch to make it work.
Thanks.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:25:26PM -0400, John Wiegley wrote:
> On May 2
On May 20, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
> This issue was supposed to have been fixed by commit
> 14449202535562b3d3d91c753fdead00a64caa79, see
Russell's patch was just applied, let me know if it is unnecessary and should
be reverted.
John
___
Russell Adams writes:
> FYI,
>
> I just updated to 6.36c and still have the issue of cached images not
> refreshing. I had to apply this patch from the ML, which fixed it.
Hi Russell,
This issue was supposed to have been fixed by commit
14449202535562b3d3d91c753fdead00a64caa79, see
http://arti
