Richard Riley writes:
> I was under the impression that the one thing that git does not
> advertise is space efficiency - it stores total file blobs for each and
> every change. So I think its efficiency is in terms of speed, not in
> terms of disk usage. And to be honest, if you worry about 54M
Leo writes:
> On 2010-02-02 12:29 +, Ian Barton wrote:
>>>
>>> The git repo I just checked out a minute ago is 54M, 20 times bigger
>>> than the org lisp files. Any idea why it is so large? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Leo
>>>
>> Don't forget it has a complete history of all org development since
>> the i
On 2010-02-02 12:29 +, Ian Barton wrote:
>>
>> The git repo I just checked out a minute ago is 54M, 20 times bigger
>> than the org lisp files. Any idea why it is so large? Thanks.
>>
>> Leo
>>
> Don't forget it has a complete history of all org development since
> the initial import of the sou
