This is good! I did not know such a setting exists. I will use this
while Carsten and others think about whether it is worth to have
appointment notifications. Thanks a lot!
Wanrong
Bernt Hansen wrote:
Set up your agenda to display today forward. My weekly view always
shows today and the n
Set up your agenda to display today forward. My weekly view always
shows today and the next 6 days.
(setq org-agenda-start-on-weekday nil)
-Bernt
Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you can stick to the habit of looking into the next day (especially
> on the last day in you weekly a
If you can stick to the habit of looking into the next day (especially
on the last day in you weekly agenda), that will work. But I am not
reliable on that. And sometimes you may need to look ahead more than one
day. I want to be lazy and dumb with the help of org. :-)
Wanrong
I simply ent
Hi Wanrong
> To achieve that goal, sometimes I need some sense of what is going to
> happen or what I am supposed to do tomorrow, or next a few days,
> depending on the task and context. To check agendas ahead every day is
a
> good habit, but is not reliable, and I want to eliminate dependency
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, but manual workaround does not work
for me, as I want org to take care of giving me a notification in
advance in the agenda buffer.
For SCHEDULED and plain active time stamp, I don't think we need to
have a default ahead notification
On Feb 28, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:05 AM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
For SCHEDULED and plain active time stamp, I don't think we need to
have a default ahead notification setting as with deadlines, but it
would really be ni
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:05 AM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
>>
>> For SCHEDULED and plain active time stamp, I don't think we need to
>> have a default ahead notification setting as with deadlines, but it
>> would really be nice to support the <. -3d> format.
On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:05 AM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Bastien wrote:
Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe use SCHEDULED: instead of DEADLINE: ?
I'm afraid this won't solve Wanrong's problem: you don't get warned
about scheduled items.
Wanrong: maybe you can turn your items into sche
Wanrong Lin wrote:
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, but manual workaround does not work
for me, as I want org to take care of giving me a notification in
advance in the agenda buffer.
For SCHEDULED and plain active time stamp, I don't think we need to
have a default ahead notification s
Bastien wrote:
Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe use SCHEDULED: instead of DEADLINE: ?
I'm afraid this won't solve Wanrong's problem: you don't get warned
about scheduled items.
Wanrong: maybe you can turn your items into scheduled items and then use
`org-check-before-da
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Maybe use SCHEDULED: instead of DEADLINE: ?
>
> I'm afraid this won't solve Wanrong's problem: you don't get warned
> about scheduled items.
Oops. You're right - I should have tested that first.
Thanks for the c
Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe use SCHEDULED: instead of DEADLINE: ?
I'm afraid this won't solve Wanrong's problem: you don't get warned
about scheduled items.
Wanrong: maybe you can turn your items into scheduled items and then use
`org-check-before-date' in the relevant file
Maybe use SCHEDULED: instead of DEADLINE: ?
Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changing appointment time stamp into deadline will work, but I just
> think conceptually it is kind of twisted, because "deadline" means you
> have to do it BEFORE the specified time, while "appointment" means
13 matches
Mail list logo
