Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes it's a good strategy and one that's worked well for org-mode. I
> do however have some features which I'd like to see. If it's not too
> rude, I'll list some here:
>
> - Ability to define your own HTML 's. Specifically here the
> issue was wanting to list
On 14/10/2007, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First impressions are that Blorg seems to work quite well, though it
> > takes some setting up, and could be made more flexible
>
> Sure. I wrote blorg more than one year ago, and I made the mistake of
> trying too add too many functions too ea
Hi Rick,
Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't find writing such things easy, so I'm happy to be using
> blorg/org/emacs which don't seem to interfere as much with the
> creative flow as logging into a wordpress/blogger account can.
>
> http://sourcesmouth.co.uk/blog/
Glad to see this!
> F
