On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
2009/12/14 Carsten Dominik :
Actually, I cannot reproduce this problem - I do not see the extra
newline.
Hi Carsten,
you're absolutely right, I performed yet another git pull and couldn't
reproduce this either. Great !
Now, speaking of
2009/12/14 Carsten Dominik :
> Actually, I cannot reproduce this problem - I do not see the extra newline.
>
Hi Carsten,
you're absolutely right, I performed yet another git pull and couldn't
reproduce this either. Great !
Now, speaking of extra newlines, I'm puzzled about this: at some stage
(w
Actually, I cannot reproduce this problem - I do not see the extra
newline.
- Carsten
On Dec 10, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
2009/12/9 Nicolas Girard :
2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index 4c4d540..75ee548 100644
--- a/lisp/org-exp
>
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
>>
>> There's an extra space produced by the \label{} because there's no '%'
>> at the end of it ; another solution is to move the \label before the
>> \\
>
> I prefer to write
>
> \label{...}%
>
> if you can agree to that.
>
Sure, no proble
2009/12/10 Carsten Dominik :
>
> On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:56 AM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/9 Nicolas Girard :
>>>
>>
>> Actually I do remember why I considered removing the '\\' : take this
>> document:
>>
>> #=
>> Level 1
>>
>> ** Level 2
>>
>> *** Level 3
>>
>> Level 4
>>
2009/12/9 Nicolas Girard :
> 2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
>
>>> diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
>>> index 4c4d540..75ee548 100644
>>> --- a/lisp/org-exp.el
>>> +++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
>>> @@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ INDENT was the original indentation of the block."
>>>
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:56 AM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
2009/12/9 Nicolas Girard :
2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
Hi Nicolas,
I need additional information with respect to this patch:
diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
index ce697a3..18c2183 100644
--- a/lisp/org-latex.el
+++ b/
On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
Hi Nicolas,
I need additional information with respect to this patch:
diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
index ce697a3..18c2183 100644
--- a/lisp/org-latex.el
+++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
@@ -877,7 +
2009/12/9 Nicolas Girard :
> 2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> I need additional information with respect to this patch:
>>
>
>>> diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
>>> index ce697a3..18c2183 100644
>>> --- a/lisp/org-latex.el
>>> +++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
>>> @@ -877,7
2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I need additional information with respect to this patch:
>
>> diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
>> index ce697a3..18c2183 100644
>> --- a/lisp/org-latex.el
>> +++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
>> @@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ If NUM, export sections as n
2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik :
>> diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
>> index 4c4d540..75ee548 100644
>> --- a/lisp/org-exp.el
>> +++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
>> @@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ INDENT was the original indentation of the block."
>> (concat (car org-export-latex-
Hi Nicolas,
I need additional information with respect to this patch:
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index 4c4d540..75ee548 100644
--- a/lisp/org-exp.el
+++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
@@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ INDENT was the original indentation of the
block."
2009/12/1 Nicolas Girard :
> Hi,
> title says it all.
>
Hi,
attached is a second patch which suppresses some other extra newlines
in the LaTeX export. Let me know if you need any explanation.
--
Nicolas
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index 4c4d540..75ee548 100644
--- a/lisp/org
13 matches
Mail list logo
