Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
>
> The reason why this fails seems to be because of the looking-at.
> When this code was first written, (match-beginning 0) referred to
> the earlier regexp match, but the looking-at, if it matches,
> changes the meaning of that form.
>
> Could you please try if my
Hi Eric,
On Jun 28, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
For now I don't see anything wrong with this. The fastest
way to find out is to put it into master and watch the list :-)
Please go ahead and do that.
I think this patch may have uncovered a bug in t
Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
>
> For now I don't see anything wrong with this. The fastest
> way to find out is to put it into master and watch the list :-)
> Please go ahead and do that.
>
I think this patch may have uncovered a bug in the export preprocessing
which was previously being cover
Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
>
> For now I don't see anything wrong with this. The fastest
> way to find out is to put it into master and watch the list :-)
> Please go ahead and do that.
>
Great, I'll go ahead and try this. Thanks -- Eric
___
Emacs
On Jun 28, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
The above patch looks definitely right to me. In fact, I think the
org-if-unprotected should be around the entire content of the while
loop - with an additional fix to make sure search is resumed no
> Eric Schulte writes:
> I would disagree here. There *is* a case where a protected comment
> should be retained in the export. For example, if I'm writing a
> document in which I want to discuss Org-mode markup. It should be
> possible for me to include verbatim Org-mode code in my document
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> The above patch looks definitely right to me. In fact, I think the
>> org-if-unprotected should be around the entire content of the while
>> loop - with an additional fix to make sure search is resumed not
>> fro
Hello,
> Carsten Dominik writes:
> The above patch looks definitely right to me. In fact, I think the
> org-if-unprotected should be around the entire content of the while
> loop - with an additional fix to make sure search is resumed not
> from the beginning of location of a match that has
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
>
> The above patch looks definitely right to me. In fact, I think the
> org-if-unprotected should be around the entire content of the while
> loop - with an additional fix to make sure search is resumed not
> from the beginning of location of a match t
Hi Eric,
On Jun 28, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
I've put together two patches which fix the problems I mention below.
I'd like to apply these patches, but I fear that they may cause
unanticipated export problems. I'd be much more comfortable if
someone
who knows a little more abou
I've put together two patches which fix the problems I mention below.
I'd like to apply these patches, but I fear that they may cause
unanticipated export problems. I'd be much more comfortable if someone
who knows a little more about the exporters could take a look at these.
Thanks -- Eric
>Fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
