Hi Ian,
Ian Barton writes:
> Emacs, rather than an org problem. I am not sure it can be fixed, but I
> would be very happy to be proved wrong!
See the patch I sent this morning, which allows reading date before
1970. I'm not applying it now, trying to figure out why this limit
was necessary.
On 17/02/11 20:15, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:15:42 +0100
Michael Käufl wrote:
Hi,
I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using
“C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and org replaced the year by 2011. (The same
problem occurs with org-time-stamp- inactive and the C-u prefixed
variants.)
Hi Michael,
Michael Käufl writes:
> I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and
> org replaced the year by 2011. (The same problem occurs with org-time-stamp-
> inactive and the C-u prefixed variants.)
>
> Although I guess that this is related to the unix time,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:15:42 +0100
Michael Käufl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using
> “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and org replaced the year by 2011. (The same
> problem occurs with org-time-stamp- inactive and the C-u prefixed
> variants.)
>
> Although I guess that th
Hi,
I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and
org replaced the year by 2011. (The same problem occurs with org-time-stamp-
inactive and the C-u prefixed variants.)
Although I guess that this is related to the unix time, which starts on
01/01/1970 00:00, my lis