Re: [Orgmode] Problem with org-time-stamp & co

2011-02-18 Thread Bastien
Hi Ian, Ian Barton writes: > Emacs, rather than an org problem. I am not sure it can be fixed, but I > would be very happy to be proved wrong! See the patch I sent this morning, which allows reading date before 1970. I'm not applying it now, trying to figure out why this limit was necessary.

Re: [Orgmode] Problem with org-time-stamp & co

2011-02-18 Thread Ian Barton
On 17/02/11 20:15, Suvayu Ali wrote: On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:15:42 +0100 Michael Käufl wrote: Hi, I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and org replaced the year by 2011. (The same problem occurs with org-time-stamp- inactive and the C-u prefixed variants.)

Re: [Orgmode] Problem with org-time-stamp & co

2011-02-18 Thread Bastien
Hi Michael, Michael Käufl writes: > I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and > org replaced the year by 2011. (The same problem occurs with org-time-stamp- > inactive and the C-u prefixed variants.) > > Although I guess that this is related to the unix time,

Re: [Orgmode] Problem with org-time-stamp & co

2011-02-17 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:15:42 +0100 Michael Käufl wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using > “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and org replaced the year by 2011. (The same > problem occurs with org-time-stamp- inactive and the C-u prefixed > variants.) > > Although I guess that th

[Orgmode] Problem with org-time-stamp & co

2011-02-17 Thread Michael Käufl
Hi, I tried to enter a date before 01/01/1970 using “C-c .” (org-time-stamp) and org replaced the year by 2011. (The same problem occurs with org-time-stamp- inactive and the C-u prefixed variants.) Although I guess that this is related to the unix time, which starts on 01/01/1970 00:00, my lis