"Dmitri Minaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, but the notion of the default priority has no special meaning
> besides what jumps up after the first S-up, so we can easily assume
> that the "default" priority is A :).
Indeed.
> Or set the priorities line to #+PRIORITIES: A C C
But then S-do
On 9/24/07, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Reachable via C-up?
>
> (I assume you meant S-up?)
Ahem... Yes. :)
> With Org 5.09 and #+PRIORITIES: A C B you need to do press S-up S-down
> (or S-down S-up) to set the default priority -- or did I miss something?
>
> My suggestion [1] was that
"Dmitri Minaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 9/24/07, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And maybe you would prefer the default priority for your books (5) be
>> the first reachable one ... (see previous discussion in this thread.)
>
> Reachable via C-up?
(I assume you meant S-up?)
> It
On 9/24/07, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And maybe you would prefer the default priority for your books (5) be
> the first reachable one ... (see previous discussion in this thread.)
Reachable via C-up? It is. But Nuutti offered to interpret the absent
priority as the default one, and I pr
"Dmitri Minaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> #+PRIORITIES: 1 9 5
>
> and I rate the read books from 1 to 9. I leave the books unrated till
> I finish reading. So, to equal missing priority to a default priority
> would break this system.
And maybe you would prefer the default priority for your b
On 9/9/07, Nuutti Kotivuori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And there wouldn't need to be any "highest" or "lowest" values for the
> priorities. Also, I couldn't ever figure out why there needs to be a
> way to specify the default priority explicitly (eg. [#B] vs. lines
> that have none) - so I'd just
Hi,
On Sep 9, 2007, at 16:30, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
But as I said, this may not be good enough a reason. Open for
discussion.
I find the priority settings almost unusable for me.
[...]
But for my work tasks, priorities are really important as they are
given to m
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> But as I said, this may not be good enough a reason. Open for
> discussion.
I find the priority settings almost unusable for me.
For personal things, I just use them simply with the default settings
to mark tasks that really should be done ASAP ([#A]) - and tasks which
r
