Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

Thanks a lot. I have not got time to learn git yet (I was told it is hard to get it working under windows), so I will wait for the next release to try the feature. Wanrong Carsten Dominik wrote: This is in the git repo now. - Carsten On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: H

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

This is in the git repo now. - Carsten On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: Hi Bastien, I am not sure this i a complete enough solution. If I understand Wanrong correctly, I think he wants to be able to define the specific states that should record a time. So I guess a c

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

On Feb 14, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Wanrong Lin wrote: Hi, Carsten and Bastien, Thanks a lot for putting a lot of thought on this. I always get more than I asked for here, which is rare in life. :-) Just one more question though: Are we going to make the "CANCELED(c!)" notation also a global o

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

Hi, Carsten and Bastien, Thanks a lot for putting a lot of thought on this. I always get more than I asked for here, which is rare in life. :-) Just one more question though: Are we going to make the "CANCELED(c!)" notation also a global option (vs per-file option) when we define the TODO s

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

On Feb 14, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Bastien wrote: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am not sure this i a complete enough solution. If I understand Wanrong correctly, I think he wants to be able to define the specific states that should record a time. Yes, my patch was just doing pa

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

On Feb 14, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Bastien wrote: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am not sure this i a complete enough solution. If I understand Wanrong correctly, I think he wants to be able to define the specific states that should record a time. Yes, my patch was just doing pa

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not sure this i a complete enough solution. If I understand Wanrong > correctly, > I think he wants to be able to define the specific states that should > record a time. Yes, my patch was just doing part of the job. I wanted to check whether su

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

Hi Bastien, I am not sure this i a complete enough solution. If I understand Wanrong correctly, I think he wants to be able to define the specific states that should record a time. So I guess a complete solution would be to introduce a character like "!", similar to the "@" we are alread

Re: [Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to record down the time stamp when a TODO item changed its > state into some specific states (like "DELEGATED"), but I don't want to > be prompt with a window for notes. I like the idea. Here is a patch against latest org.el from git that i

[Orgmode] Logging state change with timestamp, but without note

Hi, I would like to record down the time stamp when a TODO item changed its state into some specific states (like "DELEGATED"), but I don't want to be prompt with a window for notes. I might be able to do that by putting those states into the DONE state and adding (setq org-log-done t) into the c