On Dec 31, 2008, at 7:54 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hi Tom,
is there a reason why you did not put the hook right after
the include file moment?
- Carsten
Yes, two. But of course your judgement should take precedence.
In order to make my change slightly less severe, I put it just before
> Hi Tom,
>
> is there a reason why you did not put the hook right after
> the include file moment?
>
> - Carsten
Yes, two. But of course your judgement should take precedence.
In order to make my change slightly less severe, I put it just before
operations of a similar nature, and it seemed to
Hi Tom,
is there a reason why you did not put the hook right after
the include file moment?
- Carsten
On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Motivating incident: I was exporting some files and I wanted to
process a file after I included it. Using "#+INCLUDE" I could include
i
Motivating incident: I was exporting some files and I wanted to
process a file after I included it. Using "#+INCLUDE" I could include
it and I could tell it to use "BEGIN_XXX" "END_XXX" so my code could
find it.
But I couldn't process it, because org-export-preprocess-string calls
`org-export-pre
