"Tim O'Callaghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. the first issue is about *including* external Org files (or other
>>external resources, although I'm not sure to understand what does
>>that mean);
>
> Yes and no. by *including* external resources i was thinking
> remote org files, and t
On 11/12/2007, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> thanks for the details. I think I got confused because I couldn't
> understand what you mean by a link being "processed" when compiling
> the agenda. Now I understand that it means some kind of inclusion.
>
> So the issue seems twofo
Hi Tim,
thanks for the details. I think I got confused because I couldn't
understand what you mean by a link being "processed" when compiling
the agenda. Now I understand that it means some kind of inclusion.
So the issue seems twofold:
1. the first issue is about *including* external Org fil
On 10/12/2007, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> "Tim O'Callaghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Currently Org mode supports links like:
> > http://www.astro.uva.nl/~dominik
> > file:/home/dominik/images/jupiter.jpg
> > news:comp.emacs
> > etc
> >
> > I wo
Hi Tim,
"Tim O'Callaghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently Org mode supports links like:
> http://www.astro.uva.nl/~dominik
> file:/home/dominik/images/jupiter.jpg
> news:comp.emacs
> etc
>
> I would like to propose the concept of 'Active' links, based on
> the abov
This is something i have been pondering for a while, and after
seeing the recent discussion on links from org files, thought i
would put forward for discussion. It is an attempt to kill two
birds with one stone. The first is collaboration, the second is a
selective trigger mechanism for generating
