On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> Here is a patch that I hope will solve the problems people are having with
> org-choose.el. It contains two intended fixes:
>
> * `eval-after-load' gets a string argument. Apparently some emacsen can
> accept a symbol, but older ones can'
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before?
>>
>> Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below:
>>
>> First the test f
Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> What version is this? Because that's clearly not what it does on emacs
> 21.3.1. Here simple.el does not have (provide 'simple) in it.
>
> I see no provision for accepting a symbol in eval-after-load. The test it
> uses is just:
>
> (assoc file load-history
Here is a patch that I hope will solve the problems people are having with
org-choose.el. It contains two intended fixes:
* `eval-after-load' gets a string argument. Apparently some emacsen can
accept a symbol, but older ones can't.
* "org-agenda" is required before `org-map-entries' is called
> Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
>>
>> >>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> (let*
>> >> ((x 1))
>> >> (eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
>> >> x)
>> >>
>> >> =3D> 2
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> (let*
>> >> ((x 1))
>> >> (eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> [...]
>> I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before?
>
> Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below:
>
> First the test file.
>
> --8<---cut here---start-
Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
> >>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> (let*
> >> ((x 1))
> >> (eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
> >> x)
> >>
> >> =3D> 2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> (let*
> >> ((x 1))
> >> (eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
> >> x)
> >
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> With three choices for choosenness, it works as I expected (only one
>> item in CHOSEN state at a time) but for more choices like:
>>
>> #+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0)
>> LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+)
>>
>> it allo
>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>>>
>>
>> (let*
>> ((x 1))
>> (eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
>> x)
>>
>> => 2
>>
>>
>>
>> (let*
>> ((x 1))
>> (eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
>> x)
>>
>> => 1
>
> In fact, I am getting 2 in both cases!???
>
nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
> Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> (let*
>>((x 1))
>>(eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
>>x)
>>
>> =3D> 2
>>
>>
>>
>> (let*
>>((x 1))
>>(eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
>>x)
>>
>> =3D> 1
>
>
> Are you sure about this? My understanding of thi
On Feb 11, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hi Tom,
maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the "#" does
in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you
know?
- Carsten
Here, it's #' that it of interest, not # alone.
At the most direc
On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
This bug is simple. In "Setting it all up" at the end of org-
choose.el,
in 6.22b a quote got introduced before progn. That's all. With
that
quote, it "evaluated" a quoted f
Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> >
>
> >> This bug is simple. In "Setting it all up" at the end of org-
> >> choose.el,
> >> in 6.22b a quote got introduced before progn. That's all. With that
> >> quote, it "evaluated" a quoted form a
>
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
>> This bug is simple. In "Setting it all up" at the end of org-
>> choose.el,
>> in 6.22b a quote got introduced before progn. That's all. With that
>> quote, it "evaluated" a quoted form and did nothing. I'd send a
>> patch,
>> but
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the "#" does
> in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you
> know?
>
> - Carsten
>
>
Here, it's #' that it of interest, not # alone.
At the most direct level, it quotes the symbol with `function'
Useful resource!
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Feb 11, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Daniel Clemente wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Tom,
maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the "#" does
in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you
know?
Since I am always ha
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Tom,
>
> maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the "#" does
> in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you know?
>
Since I am always having questions like that, I keep writing here each new
notation I find :-)
http://www.em
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-c
On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hmm, not sure if I messed up there - so I fixed this bug. Tom,
please check if I did this right.
- Carsten
Hi, Carsten. I just looked at org-6.22b
You caught a problem, but I think it's a different bug. I think there
are these d
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-c
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>>> [...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standal
>
> Hmm, not sure if I messed up there - so I fixed this bug. Tom,
> please check if I did this right.
>
> - Carsten
Hi, Carsten. I just looked at org-6.22b
You caught a problem, but I think it's a different bug. I think there
are these different things:
* What you saw, that it doesn't wor
> With three choices for choosenness, it works as I expected (only one item
> in
> CHOSEN state at a time) but for more choices like:
>
> #+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0)
> LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+)
>
> it allows multiple items to be in CHOSEN state. How do we interpret th
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> [...]
>> OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
>> org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
>
> This is very intriguing functionality. I tried to follow your and
> Casten's
> earlier exc
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
>>> org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. B
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
This is very intriguing functionality. I tried to foll
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
> OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
> org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
This is very intriguing functionality. I tried to follow your and Casten's
earlier exchanges but co
Hi, Carsten.
> Well, some ASCII documentation could be inserted into org-choose.el
> as a file commentary. If you use a standard header with keywords
> for the finder (M-x finder-commentary and friends), that would be
> useful.
>
> Tutorials on Worg are usually written in Org, but you can upload
28 matches
Mail list logo
