On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Greg Newman wrote:
Actually Github is using it now to show org files for project
readme's.
Ah, this is how github does it? Good to know.
- Carsten
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Carsten Dominik > wrote:
Hi,
has anybody tried or used this?
Should we l
Actually Github is using it now to show org files for project readme's.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody tried or used this?
>
> Should we link to it on WOrg, or include it in the contrib directory?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Carsten
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2009, at
Hi,
has anybody tried or used this?
Should we link to it on WOrg, or include it in the contrib directory?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Dec 27, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Brian Dewey wrote:
I want to use org-mode files in one of the many Ruby static website
generation tools (Webby, Webgen, Jekyll, etc.). T
That's great!
Thanks for sharing this.
Have you mentioned org-ruby to the people at github. I know that they
were looking for a tool with which to export README.org files in github
repositories to HTML, but they felt that a full Emacs instillation was
too large of a requirement. I bet they'd be
I want to use org-mode files in one of the many Ruby static website
generation tools (Webby, Webgen, Jekyll, etc.). Thus, I needed a way to
extract simple HTML from an org-mode file *without* relying on emacs.
Thus, org-ruby was born. It's not nearly as full featured as the emacs-based
HTML export