Re: [Orgmode] Announcing org-ruby

2010-04-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Greg Newman wrote: Actually Github is using it now to show org files for project readme's. Ah, this is how github does it? Good to know. - Carsten On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Carsten Dominik > wrote: Hi, has anybody tried or used this? Should we l

Re: [Orgmode] Announcing org-ruby

2010-04-14 Thread Greg Newman
Actually Github is using it now to show org files for project readme's. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi, > > has anybody tried or used this? > > Should we link to it on WOrg, or include it in the contrib directory? > > Thanks. > > - Carsten > > > On Dec 27, 2009, at

Re: [Orgmode] Announcing org-ruby

2010-04-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, has anybody tried or used this? Should we link to it on WOrg, or include it in the contrib directory? Thanks. - Carsten On Dec 27, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Brian Dewey wrote: I want to use org-mode files in one of the many Ruby static website generation tools (Webby, Webgen, Jekyll, etc.). T

Re: [Orgmode] Announcing org-ruby

2009-12-28 Thread Eric Schulte
That's great! Thanks for sharing this. Have you mentioned org-ruby to the people at github. I know that they were looking for a tool with which to export README.org files in github repositories to HTML, but they felt that a full Emacs instillation was too large of a requirement. I bet they'd be

[Orgmode] Announcing org-ruby

2009-12-27 Thread Brian Dewey
I want to use org-mode files in one of the many Ruby static website generation tools (Webby, Webgen, Jekyll, etc.). Thus, I needed a way to extract simple HTML from an org-mode file *without* relying on emacs. Thus, org-ruby was born. It's not nearly as full featured as the emacs-based HTML export