Peter Frings writes:
> We once thought of having some markup in our LaTeX files to track changes,
> offering annotations. If
> I recall correctly, we had a command \changed{old}{new}{comment}.
> You could leave out the new or old text part: newly added text would be
> \changed{}{bla bla}{this is
>
On 28 Oct 2010, at 11:15, Scot Becker wrote:
> Jambunathan,
>
> (2) could be useful but a bit far-fetched at the
> moment.
>
> Really? Lots of us track changes with git, sometimes by means of one of the
> Emacs interfaces for it like Magit. You may be thinking of some
> interface-level fea
Jambunathan,
(2) could be useful but a bit far-fetched at the
> moment.
>
Really? Lots of us track changes with git, sometimes by means of one of the
Emacs interfaces for it like Magit. You may be thinking of some
interface-level features which aren't available by this method, like the
ability
Eric
> However, what would be ideal would be if there were a tool which would
> take a Word document with /track changes/ and generate a patch file for
> a text version of that document... that could then provide some
> mechanism for getting changes back into an org document (modulo problems
> w
