Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jul 2, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: David Maus writes: Carsten Dominik wrote: Hmm, the catcher did not see this. Why? He did: http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/105/ -- patch is already applied. Where can I see that? I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it?

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-02 Thread Sebastian Rose
John Wiegley writes: > On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > >> John Wiegley writes: >> >>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: >>> I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it? >>> >>> Accepted = Applied. >> >> >> http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/73

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-02 Thread John Wiegley
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > John Wiegley writes: > >> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: >> >>> I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it? >> >> Accepted = Applied. > > > http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/73/ > > was never aplied. I just di

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-02 Thread Sebastian Rose
John Wiegley writes: > On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > >> I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it? > > Accepted = Applied. http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/73/ was never aplied. I just diffed my branch against the current head. Sebastian

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-02 Thread John Wiegley
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it? Accepted = Applied. > Is it possible to link to the commit a patch was applied? After today, patches which are merged in using "pw" will note the resulting commit. John ___

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-02 Thread Sebastian Rose
David Maus writes: > Carsten Dominik wrote: >>Hmm, the catcher did not see this. Why? > > He did: http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/105/ -- patch is > already applied. Where can I see that? I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it? And there are "accepted" patches, that are not

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-01 Thread David Maus
Carsten Dominik wrote: >Hmm, the catcher did not see this. Why? He did: http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/105/ -- patch is already applied. -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber dmj...@jabber.org Email. dm...@ictsoc.de pgpH4CvhS53kO.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hmm, the catcher did not see this. Why? - Carsten On Jul 1, 2010, at 8:02 PM, David Maus wrote: * org-feed.el (org-feed-unescape): Remove superfluous lambda. --- lisp/org-feed.el |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/org-feed.el b/lisp/org-feed.el ind

[Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-07-01 Thread David Maus
* org-feed.el (org-feed-unescape): Remove superfluous lambda. --- lisp/org-feed.el |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/org-feed.el b/lisp/org-feed.el index 3edcf1a..cda7368 100644 --- a/lisp/org-feed.el +++ b/lisp/org-feed.el @@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ have bee

[Orgmode] [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.

2010-06-19 Thread David Maus
Argh. Just realized that (lambda (e) (car e)) is equivalent to (car e). This one goes on top of the patches. * org-feed.el (org-feed-unescape): Remove superfluous lambda. --- lisp/org-feed.el |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/org-feed.el b/lisp/org-