On Mar 14, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Mar 14, 2010, at 8:54 AM, David Maus wrote:
Hi Dan,
Dan Davison wrote:
[...]
Is there any reason not to
make
a change like this?
I see two problems: First we should find out what "x magnification"
and "magstep"
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 14, 2010, at 8:54 AM, David Maus wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Dan Davison wrote:
[...]
>>> Is there any reason not to
>>> make
>>> a change like this?
>>
>> I see two problems: First we should find out what "x magnification"
>> and "magstep" actually is and why the m
On Mar 14, 2010, at 8:54 AM, David Maus wrote:
Hi Dan,
Dan Davison wrote:
When creating png images of latex fragments in org-create-formula-
image,
the :scale option in org-format-latex-options is not currently
honoured
(it's commented out). My dvipng documentation says
-x num
Hi Dan,
Dan Davison wrote:
>When creating png images of latex fragments in org-create-formula-image,
>the :scale option in org-format-latex-options is not currently honoured
>(it's commented out). My dvipng documentation says
> -x num
> Set the x magnification ratio to num/1000.
When creating png images of latex fragments in org-create-formula-image,
the :scale option in org-format-latex-options is not currently honoured
(it's commented out). My dvipng documentation says
-x num
Set the x magnification ratio to num/1000. Overrides the
magnific
