Achim Gratz writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>> Probably nothing -- the FAQ gave me the impression that it was somehow
>> preferable to use the make system rather than git config to keep a local
>> git branch rebased to master; I didn't realize the note in the FAQ was
>> addressing changes to th
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> Probably nothing -- the FAQ gave me the impression that it was somehow
> preferable to use the make system rather than git config to keep a local
> git branch rebased to master; I didn't realize the note in the FAQ was
> addressing changes to the Makefile in particular.
I
Achim Gratz writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>> In the Org FAQ, under the "How can I keep local changes..." section,
>> there's a note saying that the config local:rebase options are no longer
>> needed under the new make system, and something equivalent can be done
>> using
Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> In the Org FAQ, under the "How can I keep local changes..." section,
> there's a note saying that the config local:rebase options are no longer
> needed under the new make system, and something equivalent can be done
> using local.mk configurations.
T
In the Org FAQ, under the "How can I keep local changes..." section,
there's a note saying that the config local:rebase options are no longer
needed under the new make system, and something equivalent can be done
using local.mk configurations.
I'm not terribly conversant with Makefiles, but is the
