Re: [O] unintended strike-through in table

2012-04-21 Thread Rasmus
Skip Collins writes: > I do not believe this is intended behavior for +strike-through+ text. > The + symbol serves triple duty in org syntax as a an indicator for > +stricken words+, a line drawing symbol in tables, and a #+keyword > prefix. It can also be an item which is a problem with LaTeX m

Re: [O] unintended strike-through in table

2012-04-21 Thread Gustav Wikström
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Skip, > > Skip Collins writes: > > > I see little reason to continue to support +strike-through+ text. > > Perhaps the simplest solution would be to deprecate stricken text and > > disable it by default, allowing for an option to turn it on fo

Re: [O] unintended strike-through in table

2012-04-20 Thread Bastien
Hi Skip, Skip Collins writes: > I see little reason to continue to support +strike-through+ text. > Perhaps the simplest solution would be to deprecate stricken text and > disable it by default, allowing for an option to turn it on for > backward compatibility. I agree. If no one object, I wil

[O] unintended strike-through in table

2012-04-20 Thread Skip Collins
When I open the following table in org, the characters from the first + symbol in +bar to the last + symbol on the next line are struck out, i.e. drawn with a line through the text. #+STARTUP: showall * foo | C | D    | | E | +bar | |---+--| I do not believe this is intended behavior for +str